Ross's Banner
Ross

Age/Gender: 31, Male
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Job: Code Jockey

I helped create Newgrounds. Then I left. Then I came back. Then I left again. It's like that movie "Runaway Bride", but with fewer movie stars and more computer programming.

Newgrounds Stats

Sign-Up Date:
12/15/99

Level: 13
Aura: Light

Rank: Civilian
Blams: 8
Saves: 1
Rank #: 156,072

Whistle Status: Normal

Exp. Points: 1,605 / 1,880
Exp. Rank #: 20,888
Voting Pow.: 5.47 votes

BBS Posts: 186 (0.05 per day)
Flash Reviews: 12
Music Reviews: 0
Trophies: 0
Stickers: 0

Entry #3

Jump to Entry: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 92337 ]


Ross

Movie Review: SiCKO

Posted by Ross Jul. 24, 2007 @ 2:26 AM EDT

Over the weekend, I finally saw SiCKO, Michael Moore's latest. Seeing as how he's one of the most polarizing filmmakers out there, let me preface this with my take on him:

I've never seen Roger & Me, the movie that made Michael Moore. I was first exposed to him via his short-lived TV show TV Nation, which was great. Canadian Bacon was mildly amusing. I liked Bowling for Columbine a lot - its examination of America's obsession with guns and the paranoia underlying it all. Fahrenheit 9/11 had its moments, but it had too many crazy conspiracy theories and was ultimately a partisan attack job. All in all, I like Moore's work, but feel he yanks a bit too hard on the viewer's heartstrings and sometimes fudges things to reinforce his arguments.

So that brings us to SiCKO. In short, I thought it was a great movie. For those who haven't seen it, it's an indictment of the American healthcare system, where many people have no insurance and are sometimes forced into financial dire straits by their huge medical bills. In addition, even when they are insured, insurance companies are motivated by the bottom line to deny benefits whenever possible. America is then compared to places like Canada, France, and the United Kingdom, all of which have some form of public or socialized healthcare, available to every citizen.

The movie starts with an endless parade of people who've been screwed over by the insurance industry, and who can't relate to that? My family and I have been there. As I watched, I found myself thinking over and over - how did we (America) let our healthcare system get so messed up? Where did this idiotic system originate, where some basic necessities (police, fire department, schools) are available to all, while others (healthcare) are for-profit, where you're only ever one job away from losing it? Why is it that if you're retired of self-employed, you have to decide how valuable your health really is, since being fully-insured costs an astronomical amount of money? And even if you think you're covered, why is using that coverage often such an uphill battle? I've long seen the insurance industry as the ultimate legalized racket, and this movie engraved that opinion in granite.

In the countries mentioned above, anyone receives healthcare, in some cases without regard to whether you're a citizen or not. Here's where I think the movie does itself a disservice - it makes a strong case that these other systems are better than what we've got, but it glosses over the shortcomings in them, and makes them seem so wonderful that we in America must be fools not to embrace them immediately. After watching the movie, I did enough online reading to understand that it's not as cut and dried as Moore makes it out to be. Things aren't perfect in those other countries, and public healthcare does have a price (in taxes, at the least). Still, a system where healthcare is seen as a basic right of every person is, in my mind, much better than the system we've got, where you just hope you stay lucky and never get screwed by your insurance (or lack thereof). Our current free-market approach to healthcare is clearly flawed.

His main point - that a modern society should take care of everyone - is a good one, and even with the extra silliness (like taking boats of sick people to Cuba), it comes across well. I enjoyed the scene in the movie where the Canadian golfer talks about how it all comes down to (paraphrasing), "I take care of my neighbor, because if the tables were turned, I know he'd take care of me." As a big liberal, "we're all in this together" is always on my mind. This is in contrast to the right-wing rhetoric about "personal responsibility" and "self-reliance" - which is another way of saying, "I've got mine - why don't you?" I think we can do better as a society, and if it ever came to a vote, I would support a true national healthcare plan. But with the entrenched corporate interests and the members of Congress they bankroll, along with our American attitude of "I am an island / take care of yourself", I don't see things changing anytime soon. Sadly.

sicko_poster_2.jpg

Updated: 07/24/07 9:59 AM Log in to comment! | Share this!

The People Have Spoken

6 Comments

Jul. 24, 2007 | 6:04 AM CrateOfRum says:

Unfortunately I feel the "I've got mine, Why dont you?" is the right way. It helps the industries of America. For instance, if your self-employed insurance is ridonkulous, good. No one should be self employed. All trades and such already have big companies, why do you need to start your own? I say "suck to be that guy"
He should've worked for Breyers and gotten his employee insurance through them instead of trying to open his own ice cream thing.
The only ppl who need help with health care are the elderly. Everyone should just work harder and stop complaining, at least they aren't old.

Jul. 24, 2007 | 9:46 AM Ross responds:

"No one should be self-employed"... riiiiiight. Like, for instance - Tom Fulp. He should drop this silly website and go get a real job working for IBM or something.

"Sucks to be you" isn't the way a society should work, especially in the richest country on Earth.


Jul. 24, 2007 | 4:58 PM Chadda1st says:

what's your favorite flash submission?
P.S. props in coming back to the last person that commented


Jul. 25, 2007 | 12:47 AM cicla says:

wow man here in my country (Dominican Republic happen the same thing) but not just in the health care, it happens in everything! everyone here needs to be in an island and have their own stuffs, cause the public services are lacking a lot. For example here we have limited power (electricity) limited water and the public transport is crap (not even talk about other stuffs, like public health, the police, etc) but i know it sounds like this is a jungle and it is not. We are a 3rd world country thats right but the economy here is good enough to have better public services... The problem here is the way the people think, everyone think like an island. The police is crap, the people buy a gun to protect their self; theres not water 24/7 the people build water cisterns; no power 24/7 the people buy power plants... but if we better think together like a society all of that would be cheaper to everyone.


Jul. 25, 2007 | 1:57 PM chi-master08 says:

I don't know how this happened, but when my appendix was removed I had to stay in the hospital for about a week with no insurance or anything really, but the strange thing is my family never got a bill for me staying or for the operation, which would have been about 1000 dollars. I consider myself to be extremely lucky. Just thought I would mention it.


Jul. 25, 2007 | 7:24 PM Vectore says:

i guess no country is perfect, for example here in Canada the hospital waiting rooms are killers (no pun intended) i mean you could wait up to 3 hours just to see a docter for 3 mins, its ridiculous, what's worse is some people abuse the system by going to the hospital for stupid things like a cold. that SICKO poster looks more like a hospital waiting room in Canada. whats sad here is Canadian docters dont get paid that much with are system, so doctors are leaving to go to america. man thing suck everyware.<=(

Aug. 5, 2007 | 5:51 PM Ross responds:

There are trade-offs no matter which way you go. Anyone holding out for a perfect system will be waiting forever. I think the question then becomes, which trade-offs are worth making, and which aren't?

If we posed the question, what would you think of a system where the wealthiest people get great healthcare, those in the middle get healthcare that's usually okay, but always carries the risk of screwing you over, and the poorest 10% get no healthcare at all - is that acceptable?

I think the main point of "SiCKO" is that there are more equitable arrangements out there - such as Canada, where the overall level of care might be lower than in the USA, but at least everybody is covered.

That, and the fact that it's insane to have for-profit companies in an industry that serves basic human necessities.

Updated: Aug. 5, 2007, 5:53 PM

Jul. 26, 2007 | 1:02 PM TjA says:

Richest country on Earth is Japan :) atm... Yeah, ive watched a lot of documentary's on all different things and to be honest its very biased. Though americas health system seems to be extremely high i believe its a 1 time payment, you also have clean hospitals unlike the yearly payments in europe which at the moment have many hospital infections are going around.

Aug. 5, 2007 | 5:57 PM Ross responds:

I'm not sure what you mean by "one-time payment". In the USA, if you don't have insurance, or if you do but they won't cover you in a given situation, you pay whatever the procedure costs, which often ranges from "exorbitant" to "banruptcy-inducing".

The central truth of the system is that everyone has to hope they stay healthy and don't get unlucky with a serious illness or bad accident. Which is crazy - it's 2007, it's time we treated healthcare as a basic necessity, and not a privilege handed out by gatekeeper insurance companies.

Updated: Aug. 5, 2007, 5:57 PM

Jump to Entry: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 92337 ]